- Community Coops - Addressing and solving the issues of Consumer Cooperatives
- A Public Statement From The Cascadia Coalition Against Hate
- Fabio Interviews Alexander - MHCC Independent Report
- In Regards to Political Secession and Working Within Corrupt Imperial Politics
- Lecture on Cascadian Bioregionalism - 4th class
Consumer cooperatives provide millions of people in Cascadia and alternative to the standard Capitalist model. While they act in a way more beneficial to the average member of the working class they still share many of the same issues that Capitalist firms do.
Consumer Cooperatives operate the way most firms do in a market economy but are owned and operated by the consumers themselves rather than a private Capitalist or a Board of Directors. This enables consumers to work directly in their own interests often receiving a rebate at the end of the year rather than centralizing wealth into the hands of a small group of the Capitalist class.
Since Consumer Cooperatives do not receive investment from a pool of private investors, with the intent of exploiting as much surplus labor as possible, raising capital presents issues. Many consumer cooperatives raise capital via a process known as a buy in. This raises similar issues that Capitalism does in that the cooperative is inaccessible to those who cannot afford the membership cost.
Externalization of Costs
Consumer Cooperatives often allow people that do not live in the immediate community to become members of the cooperative. This allows for the same exact externalization of costs that is allowed for under Capitalism.
For example, a member of a Consumer Cooperative could vote to lower the wages of the workers in a particular firm and never have to directly deal with the consequences of such actions increased crime, homelessness, etc. This could also apply to issues such as pollution.
A proposal for Community Cooperatives
These problems can be solved by the creation of what I have termed Community Cooperatives. These cooperatives would operate similarly to Consumer Cooperatives but membership would be issued according to residency in a particular locality.
Keep in mind that this does not, per say, exclude consumers that are non-members from patronizing these firms. There are many Consumer Cooperatives, as they exist, that allow non-members to do so. Non-members are only excluded from rebates and decision making. While cooperatives could implement such policy it would ultimately work against their own interests as it would reduce the total rebate.
I propose that communities assess needs (needs being defined by demand so strong that a good or service does not require profit incentivization) and implement these cooperatives where they can. Anything from grocery stores to internet access to medical clinics to electricity to automotive repair shops could fall within this category.
Through Community Cooperatives individuals and communities could take the money and resources that would normally be extracted by the Capitalist class and use them how they see fit.